Going into 2025, a top priority for state and local governments around the country is figuring out how to boost permitting efficiency. With hundreds of software options available, it can be daunting for teams to try and thoroughly evaluate all of them. We’ve put together a helpful list of the most important features to look for when vetting a permitting platform, as well as a running list of some of the top providers in the space. We will update this list periodically throughout the year.
Features to Look For
Online Portal
The future of permitting is cloud-based software that can create a more streamlined and transparent permitting process for staff and applicants. In 2025, most cities are moving towards cloud-based software for permitting. Look for a system that offers a simple, intuitive portal that your residents will be able to navigate easily.
Built-in Electronic Plan Review
Your staff shouldn’t have to switch back-and-forth between different programs to review plans, which can create additional administrative work and increase the likelihood of errors. Look for permitting platforms that allow you to review plans in the same place as where you manage your projects.
Excellent Customer Support
Vendors differ widely in the level of support provided. Some vendors on the lower end of the cost spectrum can seem like a great deal but ultimately require you to do the hard work of implementing the software and making ongoing modifications, such as changing workflows and fees. Other vendors can take days or weeks to address simple issues.
If you don’t have a lot of extra bandwidth or can’t designate someone on your team as a system administrator, make sure your permitting software vendor offers a dedicated point of contact such as a Customer Success Manager that can guide you through the overall implementation process and provide long-term support.
Support for Citizens
Chances are not everyone in your community is tech savvy. Make sure your vendor offers direct support to your residents in case of things like system bugs, forgotten passwords etc. If you are responsible for tech support and training your community on a new system, your rollout might create a lot of extra work for staff.
Project History / Correspondence Tracking
The best permitting programs can reduce back-office work by automatically collecting a history of all activity and correspondence related to projects, including emails / notifications sent to applicants.
Mobile Inspections
With inspectors spending most of their time in the field, the software they use should be able to function there. Mobile inspection functionality allows inspectors to log their inspections from anywhere, without having to go back to the office to re-enter data.
Questions to Ask
It’s important to do your research when it comes to evaluating software, but it’s even more important to ask software providers questions! Here’s a few that can help you start the conversation and decide whether a certain platform is right for your department:
Can you explain how the implementation process will work and what support will look like throughout it and the life of the contract?
What is your pricing based on?
Do you charge by seat?
Are there any caps on data?
Do you charge for additional support?
What changes are included for free and what do I need to pay for?
Will the vendor make edits on your behalf, or will you need an internal administrator or external consultant to make changes to workflows and documents?
What size customers do you normally work with?
To help get you started on the software journey, here’s an idea of some of the companies in the space and their offerings.
Company
🥇 Best for
Pros
❌ Cons
GovWell
Smaller cities (under 75k residents) and counties who value customer/resident support, configurability, and having integrated electronic plan review in one place.
- Modern and intuitive interface
- Highly responsive support (1 min response time) for staff/citizens
- Built-in electronic plan review
- Highly configurable to your unique needs
- Affordable price for smaller and mid-sized agencies
- One of the newer permitting software companies
- Not the priciest, but more expensive than the lowest price options
- Lacks some features that larger cities will look for
iWorQ
Smaller cities who need one of the lowest price options, even if that means doing a lot of work themselves.
- Among the lowest price options available
- Also has a solution for Public Works
- Less modern interface/older system can cause issues for users or residents who aren’t tech savvy
- Lower price means implementation/support can be less hands-on
- File upload size + data storage limits
- Some former customers have had issues retrieving data when leaving
Cloudpermit
Smaller agencies who need a simple permitting system and don’t care about electronic plan review or resident support.
- Modern and intuitive interface
- Unlimited users
- Affordable price
- Lacks built-in electronic plan review
- Simplicity means it can lack more robust features
- Lower price means implementation/support can be less hands-on
Tyler Technologies (EnerGov)
Larger cities/counties who want to partner with an established brand and can pay a premium for it. Provides the most comprehensive features but can require significant resources/time to implement.
- Lots of features
- Well-established company/brand with lots of resources
- Can be integrated with other Tyler products
- Extremely expensive
- Very complicated/lengthy to implement. Typically requires a dedicated system administrator
- Support and modifications often cost extra
- If a smaller jurisdiction, support/product needs can get deprioritized
OpenGov (Acquired by Cox Enterprises)
Larger cities who need a modern system and can pay a premium for it, but don’t want to go with Tyler.
- Lots of features
- Unlimited users
- Well-established company/brand
- Very expensive
- Products don’t all “talk together”
- Recent acquisition by Cox Enterprises means long-term future uncertain
SmartGov (Acquired by Granicus)
Medium + large cities who need many hyper-specific/niche features in their system.
- Lots of features
- Robust reporting capabilities
- User interface is complex
- Some customers report support quality and innovation has decreased after multiple acquisitions by private equity firms
- Smaller cities may get deprioritized
MyGov
Medium-size cities looking for a less expensive alternative to Tyler or OpenGov.
- Inexpensive compared to Tyler, OpenGov
- Some customers have had challenges after system updates from 4.0 to 5.0 - Some customers find the document management system to be very cumbersome compared to other systems
Finding the right software is one of the most important decisions your department will have to make. At GovWell, we’re here to help guide you through the process and answer any questions you have. Click here to book a demo with us today.